Mechanisms of Social Influence. New Opportunities to Influence the Process of Administrative Norms Enforcement
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
Abstract
The main aim of this article is to present three social influence mechanisms (coercion, persuasion, acculturation) and to compare these mechanisms with the traditional public administration methods (coercion and persuation).
This comparative analysis represents the new possibilities to enforce the administrative law.
The last part of this article represents the social problem in Lithuania – the enforcement of the administrative law, which garanties the right of persons with disabilities to park in the special places and public action (opinion) during this enforcement process.
The conclusion of this article is that the respect the right of persons with disabilities, the ensurance their independence, their social and occupational integration and participation in the life of community are not entirely the issues of administrative law forcement by traditional public administration methods (coercion and persuasion); the acculturation, as the mechanism of social influence, might be the alternative key.
This comparative analysis represents the new possibilities to enforce the administrative law.
The last part of this article represents the social problem in Lithuania – the enforcement of the administrative law, which garanties the right of persons with disabilities to park in the special places and public action (opinion) during this enforcement process.
The conclusion of this article is that the respect the right of persons with disabilities, the ensurance their independence, their social and occupational integration and participation in the life of community are not entirely the issues of administrative law forcement by traditional public administration methods (coercion and persuasion); the acculturation, as the mechanism of social influence, might be the alternative key.
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
Section
Articles
This is an open-access journal, which means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or their institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This follows the BOAI definition of open access. Authors contributing to Jurisprudence agree to publish their articles under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public (CC BY) License (applicable from 2025).
Authors retain copyright of their work, with first publication rights granted to the Association for Learning Technology.
Please see Copyright and Licence Agreement for further details.
