About possible types of regulation of forensic examination
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
Abstract
Odering and carrying out of forensic examinations are regulated by laws on criminal and civil procedures. Other public relations of this sphere are regulated by local legal norms or they are left without legal regulation. Authors of this article propose to fill this gap with law on forensic examination. This law may have the following structure: 1. General provisions; 2. Experts; 3. Institutions of forensic examination; 4. Request for and carrying out of forensic examination; 5. Financing of institutions of forensic examination; 6. Social warrants of forensic experts. Such unified regulation fo forensic examination and related public relations have following benefits: 1. Universality – it is to be applied in civil, criminal and administrative procedures; 2. Obligatoriness – provisions of the law are to be compulsary to all subjects; 3. Stability – no department would be able to change provisions of the law.
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
Section
Articles
This is an open-access journal, which means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or their institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This follows the BOAI definition of open access. Authors contributing to Jurisprudence agree to publish their articles under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public (CC BY) License (applicable from 2025).
Authors retain copyright of their work, with first publication rights granted to the Association for Learning Technology.
Please see Copyright and Licence Agreement for further details.
