The moral Limits of Rights of Freedom Speech (Expression)
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
Abstract
The genesis and basis of the moral limits of rights of freedom of speech (expression) are discussed in the article. It is proved in this article that the freedom of expression is directly determined by ideas of truth and goodness. The idea of truth in the process of speech is expressed through the information communication act and the idea of goodness through the intention of the speaker. It is shown in the article that in this case, when information is communicated through the text (article in the newspaper and etc.) the intention of the articles author is expressed through the complex social values taking into account the intellectual abilities to comprehend this information truly by the user.
It is suggested to classify people opinion into three categories: a) nonprofesional opinion; b) professional opinion; c) official opinion. It is underlined in the article, that every opinion has specifically regulatory law sings. It is shown in the article that together with the right of freedom of expression the information user‟s rights exist. If the publicly demonstrated information injuries the dignity of religious feeling and the values that are cultivated in the society, the information user has the right address to the court.
It is suggested to classify people opinion into three categories: a) nonprofesional opinion; b) professional opinion; c) official opinion. It is underlined in the article, that every opinion has specifically regulatory law sings. It is shown in the article that together with the right of freedom of expression the information user‟s rights exist. If the publicly demonstrated information injuries the dignity of religious feeling and the values that are cultivated in the society, the information user has the right address to the court.
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
Section
Articles
This is an open-access journal, which means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or their institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This follows the BOAI definition of open access. Authors contributing to Jurisprudence agree to publish their articles under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public (CC BY) License (applicable from 2025).
Authors retain copyright of their work, with first publication rights granted to the Association for Learning Technology.
Please see Copyright and Licence Agreement for further details.
