##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

Justinas Leonavičius

Abstract

The article analyses the subject matter of corruption offences (bribery, influence peddling, and kickback) - a bribe. A bribe can take various forms, while the correct identification of a bribe determines the application and severity of criminal liability. Therefore, the thesis analyses problematic issues related to the determination of the value of a bribe and delimitation of a bribe from a gift/a gift from a bribe. The author of the article has analysed how the value of a bribe is determined and has found that neither the legal regulation nor the case-law has established any special rules for proving the value of a bribe, and that its monetary value may be proved by all legal means. However, the case-law of the Supreme Court of Lithuania has formulated certain rules of interpretation of the law on the proof of the value of a bribe which allow for an effective solution of the problems of the application of the law in 
relation to corrupt criminal offences. The article also analyses the social and legal differences between a bribe and a gift: a gift is gratuitous and does not involve an official relationship, while a bribe is a reward for an act/omission done, being done or to be done in the future. It concludes that the general rule established by both legislation and case law is that gifts to public sector employees are prohibited and criminalised as bribes, irrespective of their denomination, value, as well as the moments of giving and receiving them.
Keywords: corruption; bribe, gift; value of bribe; form of bribe.

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Section
Articles