THE POWER TO REMOVE: A COMPARATIVE INQUIRY INTO RECALL MECHANISMS IN INDONESIA AND THE PHILIPPINES
plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main678c6d441ff70
Santrauka
This study investigates the implementation of recall mechanisms in Indonesia and the Philippines, highlighting their roles in fostering political accountability and public participation. Recall, as a democratic tool, allows citizens to remove elected officials before the end of their term, ensuring responsiveness and integrity in governance. Utilizing a comparative legal approach, this research examines the distinct frameworks and political contexts of recall in the two countries. In Indonesia, recall is centralized and primarily applied at the national legislative level, reflecting efforts to maintain institutional stability amidst complex political dynamics. Conversely, the Philippines adopts a decentralized approach, with recall mechanisms empowering local communities to hold their leaders accountable. While both systems aim to enhance accountability, significant differences exist in their processes, actors, and outcomes. Indonesia’s model emphasizes party control and institutional safeguards, often limiting public participation, whereas the Philippines prioritizes citizen involvement, albeit at the risk of politicization and instability. This comparative analysis underscores the interplay between political systems, cultural dynamics, and democratic values, offering critical insights for policymakers and scholars seeking to refine accountability frameworks.
plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details678c6d44235d5
Authors contributing to International Comparative Jurisprudence agree to publish their articles under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International Public (CC BY-NC-ND) License, allowing third parties to share their work (copy, distribute, transmit) and to adapt it, under the condition that the authors are given credit, and that in the event of reuse or distribution, the terms of this license are made clear.