The Problems of the Registration of Non-Visible Sign as European Community Trademark: Theory and Practice (article in Lithuanian)
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
Abstract
The registration of sounds, smells and tastes as Community Trademarks, became possible from April 1, 1996. Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trademarks and Designs) (OHIM) began accepting applications for these new forms of marks when EC Regulation 40/94 on the Community Trademark came into force. These new forms of trademarks (sounds, smells and tastes) are known as trademarks consisting of a non-visible sign. One of the requirements, which have to be satisfied by trademarks consisting of a non-visible sign before registration will be granted, is that mark must be capable of graphical representation. The purpose of this requirement is to ensure that infringement rights can be determined and third parties can understand from the graphical representation, the nature of the mark. A number of cases, analyzed in the article (Case C-273/00, Ralf Sieckmann v. Deutsches Patent-und Markenamt, Case C-283/01, Shield Mark BV v. Joost Kist h.o.d.n. Memex, etc.) have considered whether the requirement of graphical representation can be satisfied by marks consisting of sounds, tastes and smells. The first decision of the Court of Justice of the European Union (ECJ) relating to trademarks consisting of a non-visible sign was Sieckmann decision (Case C-273/00, Ralf Sieckmann v. Deutsches Patent-und Markenamt), which dealt with the issue of graphic representation, specifically for smells.
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
Section
Articles
Authors contributing to Societal Sciences agree to publish their articles under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International Public Licence (CC BY-NC-ND), allowing third parties to share their work (copy, distribute, transmit) and to adapt it, under the condition that the authors are given credit, and that in the event of reuse or distribution, the terms of this licence are made clear.
Authors retain copyright of their work, with first publication rights granted to the Association for Learning Technology.
Authors retain copyright of their work, with first publication rights granted to the Association for Learning Technology.