Saule T. Okutayeva, Emin Kh. Askerov, Gulzhan T. Kunafina, Marzhan S. Tolysbayeva, Zamira S. Mukhambetova


The relevance of the study is conditioned by a plenitude of difficulties that have a constraining influence on the development of social entrepreneurship in Kazakhstan. The purpose of the study is to define the term “social entrepreneurship”, to trace its differences with non-profit organisations. Therewith, it is necessary to understand what factors hinder the development of social entrepreneurship in Kazakhstan and propose solutions to these problems. The leading approach to the study was the analysis of the experience of foreign countries in social entrepreneurship development, an overview of the problems faced by acting social entrepreneurs around the world, as well as the study of work experience of social entrepreneurs in Kazakhstan. The results of the study demonstrated that the main factors hindering the development of social entrepreneurship in Kazakhstan are the lack of a legal framework regulating the activities of social entrepreneurs; lack of lending programs; high level of taxation, etc. Ways of solving these problems were proposed: development of a legal form for social entrepreneurs; consolidation of the legal term, establishment of criteria and principles of social entrepreneurship; involvement of state and quasi-state organisations to support burgeoning social entrepreneurs, etc.


social work; non-profit organisations; volunteers; public support

Full Text:



Alter, S.K. 2003. Social Enterprise: A Typology of the Field Contextualised in Latin America. Washington: Inter-American Development Bank.

Ashoka. 2020. Social Entrepreneur.,%2C%20cultural%2C%20and%20environmental%20challenges.

Bespalko, I.L. 2019. “Principles of Criminal Proceedings as Requirements Concerning the Activities of Public Bodies, their Customs and Service Persons (Problems of Regulatory Administration)”. Journal of the National Academy of Legal Sciences of Ukraine 26(2): 74-84.

Blouin, M.C., Lee, R.L., and Erickson, G.S. 2018. “The Impact of Online Financial Disclosure and Donations in Non-Profits.” Journal of Non-profit and Public Sector Marketing 30 (3): 251-266.

Boschee, J., and McClurg, J. 2003. Toward a Better Understanding of Social Entrepreneurship: Some Important Distinctions.

Dees, J.G. 1998. The Meaning of Social Entrepreneurship. Palo Alto: Stanford Graduate School of Business.

Dees, J.G. 2011. The Meaning of “Social Entrepreneurship”.

Dees, J.G., Emerson, J., and Economy, P. 2001. Enterprising Non-Profits: A Toolkit for Social Entrepreneurs. NewYork: JohnWiley&Sons,

Dubovitskikh, J. 2015. Eco Packages from Plant Raw Materials Are Made in Astana.

Grand Prix. Advertising Standard. 2014. Experience in the Development of Social Entrepreneurship in the United States.

Guo, B., and Peng, S. 2020. “Do Non-Profit and For-Profit Social Enterprises Differ in Financing?” Voluntas 31 (3): 521-532.

Kuznetsova, N.S., and Khomenko, V.O. 2020. “Pro-Subjective Enterprise Concept”. Journal of the National Academy of Legal Sciences of Ukraine 27(3): 14-27.

Liptrap, J.S. 2020. “The Social Enterprise Company in Europe: Policy and Theory.” Journal of Corporate Law Studies 20 (2): 495-539.

Mair, J., and Marty, I. 2006. “Social Entrepreneurship Research: A Source of Explanation, Prediction, and Delight.” Journal of World Business 41 (1): 36-44.

Martin, R.L., and Osberg, S. 2007. Social Entrepreneurship: The Case for Definition.

Ministry of Information and Social Development of the Republic of Kazakhstan. 2020. Plan of a Pilot Program for the Development of Social Entrepreneurship.

Mohamed A.S., Hay, D., and van Staden, C.J. 2018. “The Influence of Culture and Corporate Governance on Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure: A Cross Country Analysis.” Journal of Cleaner Production 198: 820-832.

Pavlov, R. 2018. “The Institutional Analysis of Development of Social Entrepreneurship in the USA, UK And Germany.” In Proceedings of the European Conference on Innovation and Entrepreneurship, ECIE. Aveiro: University of Aveiro.

Polukarov, Yu.O., Prakhovnik, N.A., Polukarov, O.I., Demchuk, H.V., and Zemlyanska, O.V. 2021. “Assessment of the Economic Effect from the Implementation of Labour Protection Measures at Enterprises”. Scientific Bulletin of Mukachevo State University. Series “Economics” 8(1): 68-76.

Shatska, Z.Y. 2021. “Enterprise Integration Models: Advantages and Challenges of Implementation in the Context of the COVID-19 Pandemic”. Scientific Bulletin of Mukachevo State University. Series “Economics” 8 (2): 17-24.

Shevchuk, V.M. 2020. “Methodological Problems of the Conceptual Framework Development for Innovation Studies in Forensic Science”. Journal of the National Academy of Legal Sciences of Ukraine 27(2): 170-183.

Strapchuk, S.I. 2021. “Level of Ecological and Economic Diversification: A Methodology for Assessing the Sustainability of Agricultural Enterprises”. Scientific Bulletin of Mukachevo State University. Series “Economics” 8(2), 101-7.

Suykens, B., De Rynck, F., and Verschuere, B. 2019. “Non-Profit Organisations in Between the Non-Profit and Market Spheres: Shifting Goals, Governance and Management?” Non-profit Management and Leadership 29 (4): 623-636.

Thomson Reuters Foundation. 2016. The Best Countries to Be a Social Entrepreneur. Retrieved from:

Waddock, S., and Post, J.E. 1991. “Social Entrepreneurs and Catalytic Change.” Public Administration Review 51 (5): 393-401.

Yang, M., and Gabrielsson, P. 2018. “The Interface of International Marketing and Entrepreneurship Research: Review, Synthesis, and Future Directions.” Journal of International Marketing 26 (4): 18-37.



  • There are currently no refbacks.

"Public Policy and Administration" ISSN online 2029-2872 / ISSN print 1648-2603