The issue attention cycle model and corruption issues in Canada and Kazakhstan

Mergen Dyussenov


The present research paper attempts to apply the issue attention cycle model of Anthony Downs to corruption issues in the contexts of Canada as a democracy, and Kazakhstan as a soft authoritarian regime. The major contributions to the existing body of knowledge include: 1. replicating the Down’s model to analyze the corruption issue across the two countries; and 2. attempting to observe cycle variations depending on the nature of political regimes, and thus holding the regime as an independent variable as applied to the Down’s model.


Anthony Downs; Canada; Kazakhstan

Full Text:



About Kazakhstan (2014). Kazakhstan Government, Political System (Politics). Accessed


Adilet (2014). Legal information system of Regulatory Legal Acts of the Republic of Kazakhstan.

Accessed from:

Badalau, N. (2012). Corruption and Decentralization in Local Public Administration. Valahia

University of Targoviste, Romania.

Banciu, D. (2007). Juridical Sociology, Bucharest: Lumina Lex Edition.

Bertot, J. Jaeger, P., Grimes, J. (2010). Using ICTs to create a culture of transparency:

E-government and social media as openness and anti-corruption tools for societies, University

of Maryland.

Bowyer, A. (2008, May). Parliament and Political Parties in Kazakhstan. Central Asia-Caucasus

Institute Silk Road Studies Program. Accessed from:

Brym, R., Godbout, M., Hoffbauer, A., Menard, G., & Zhang, T. H. (2014). Social media in the

Egyptian uprising. The British Journal of Sociology, 65(2), 266-292. doi:10.1111/1468-


Business Anti-Corruption Portal (2014). Kazakhstan Country Profile: Kazakhstani Public Anti-

Corruption Initiatives. Accessed from:


Caiden, G. & Kim, J. (1993, June). A New Anti-Corruption Strategy for Korea. In Asian Journal

of Political Science, vol. 1, no. 1. Times Academic Press

Canada’s Democracy Week (2014). Canada’s Political System. Accessed from:


Canadian Broadcasting Corporation (2006, October 26). Indepth: sponsorship scandal. CBC

News Online. Accessed from:

Canadian Case Law Database (2014).

De Sousa, L., Larmour, P., & Hindess, B. eds., (2009a). Governments, NGOs and

Anti-Corruption: The New Integrity Warriors, London: Routledge.

De Sousa, L. (2009b, July 7). Anti-corruption Agencies: between empowerment and irrelevance.

Springer Science + Business Media B.V.

Downs, A. (1972: Summer). Up and Down with Ecology-the Issue-Attention Cycle, Public

Interest, 28, p.38

Federation of Malaya (1955). Report of a Commission of Enquiry into the Integrity of the Public

Services, Kuala Lumpur.

Gilbert, L. & Mohseni, P. (2011). Beyond Authoritarianism: The Conceptualization of Hybrid

Regimes. Springer Science + Business Media, LLC.

The Guardian (2012). Internet censorship listed: how does each country compare? Accessed from:

Heilbrunn, J. (2004). Anti-Corruption Commissions: Panacea or Real Medicine to Fight

Corruption? World Bank Institute.

Holt, D. & Barkemeyer, R. (2012). Media coverage of sustainable development issues –

attention cycles or punctuated equilibrium? Sustainable Development, vol. 20 (1).

Howlett, M. (2009). Studying Public Policy: Policy Cycles and Policy Subsystems. Oxford University

press, third edition.

Howlett, M. (1997). Issue-Attention and Punctuated Equilibria Models Reconsidered: An

Empirical Examination of the Dynamics of Agenda-Setting in Canada. Canadian Journal of

Political Science

Ionescu, L. (2013, September). The role of technology in combating corruption. Addleton

Academic Publishers. Accessed from:


Ivanyna, M. & Shah, A. (2010). Decentralization (Localization) and Corruption: New Country

Evidence. The World Bank, World Bank Institute, Governance Division. Policy Research

Working Paper 5299.

Kim, C. (2013). Anti-Corruption Initiatives and E-Government: A Cross-National Study.

Springer Science + Business Media New York.

Mukhtarova, A., Mammadli, E. & Ilko, I. (2013). Anticorruption Policy in Canada and

Kazakhstan: Bottom-up vs. Top-down Agenda-setting. Revista de Estudios Juridicos

no.13/2013 (Segunda Epoca). Universidad de Jaen

National Anti-corruption Strategy 2005-2007 (2014), Romanian Anti-corruption Portal.

Neo, B.S. & Chen, G. (2007). Dynamic Governance: Embedding Culture, Capabilities and

Change in Singapore. Chapter 4 (p. 157). World Scientific.

Nicolescu-Waggonner, C. (2012). Rule of Law: The Negative Impact of Corruption on the

Consolidation of Democracy, University of California, Riverside.



Nur Otan (2014). The Nur Otan party’s official web-site.

Open Net Initiative (2010). Country Profiles: Kazakhstan.

Parliament of Canada (2014 a). LEGIS info database. Accessed from:

Parliament of Canada (2014 b). The Canadian System of Government. Accessed from:

Permadi, D. (2013, work in progress). Social Media and Windows of Opportunity in Agenda-

Setting: A Pilot Project (Case Study: Jakarta, Indonesia)

Ripberger, J. (2011). Capturing Curiosity: Using Internet Search Tools to Measure Public

Attentiveness. The Policy Studies Journal, vol. 39 (2).

Quah, J. (2010, 22.10-23.10). Curbing Corruption in Asian Countries: The Difference Between

Success and Failure. The 4th International Conference on Public Management in the 21st

Century: Opportunities and Challenges. Macau

Quah, J. (1982). Bureaucratic Corruption in the ASEAN Countries: A Comparative Analysis of

Their Anti-Corruption Strategies, Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, Vol. 13, No. 1 (Mar.,

, pp. 153-177. URL:

Quah, J. (1978). Administrative and Legal Measures for Combating Bureaucratic Corruption in


Rose-Ackerman & Truex, R. (2012, February). Corruption and Policy Reform. Yale Law &

Economics Research Paper No. 444.

Rosenbloom, D. (1989). Public Administration: understanding management, politics, and law in

the public sector. Second edition. New York: Random House.

Shah, A., & Schacter, M. (2004). Combating corruption: Look before you leap. Finance &

Development, 41(4), 40-43.

Transparency International (2014). How Do You Define Corruption? Accessed from:

Transparency International (2012). Corruption Perception Index. Accessed from

Transparency Kazakhstan (2014). Kazakhstan anti-corruption legislation. Accessed from:



  • There are currently no refbacks.

"Public Policy and Administration" ISSN online 2029-2872 / ISSN print 1648-2603